6 Comments

Dave, I share your interest as you describe: “ I am interested in clever ideas and innovations and the smart, driven individuals trying to drag them into the real world. I am interested in people trying to solve problems, not business as such.”

Along those lines, I would love to hear follow-up interviews or stories with some of these folks x years later. What happened? Did it work? I feel like your audience (well, me) would benefit from hearing why some of these ideas that seemed so exciting did or didn’t really payoff as expected. Eg. What ever happened with this: https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/5/17373314/electricity-technology-efficiency-software-waste-3dfs or what is google on with Dr. Ye Tao’s mirrors, etc. might be an interesting new template for an occasional pod from Volts. Thanks as always for your work.

Expand full comment

Great idea to follow up! Thanks for the 3DFS link. Seems like a brilliant concept.

Expand full comment

Emily’s comments about the synergy of how this modular 24/7 base-load solution fits with other low-cost, low maintenance, widely distributed renewable technologies really struck me. Remote utility scale solutions that require new transmission spending will not advance our energy transition rapidly enough: Too much bureaucratic inertia & regulatory impediments, not to mention inefficiencies & lack of resilience. The way to pick up the pace is by exploiting existing widely distributed under-utilized resources, like miles of 24/7 canals and thousands of acres of valuable urban land locked up in large parking lots that can be very rapidly covered with standardized solar canopies + storage batteries & V2G chargers with simple expedited local building department approval. It’s simple, scalable projects like this that will begin to create our future matrix of reliable networked micro grids

Expand full comment

This was an interesting and informative podcast.

From a pod technical POV: Did you notice the guest's audio fading in & out during the interview/recording?

Expand full comment

Any sense of the size of the resource, canals only?

Expand full comment

Yeah, I was going to point out that it's unlikely all those 30,000 canals are in the right place and have the right energy to be worth exploiting. If there are lots that can be exploited for hundreds of kilowatts each, you might pick a round number by multiplying 30,000 by just 100 kW, four of their largest units.

That comes to 3GW, or one big nuclear plant. Or 1% of the solar that will be installed world-wide, in 2023.

This isn't saving the world, but it could be important, because it may alleviate a lot of transmission, because power is found where needed, and provide a lot of grid-balancing when renewables make it more and more variable.

Expand full comment